diff --git a/How-I-Learned-to-Balance-Probability-Models%2C-ROI-Thinking%2C-and-the-Limits-of-Prediction.md b/How-I-Learned-to-Balance-Probability-Models%2C-ROI-Thinking%2C-and-the-Limits-of-Prediction.md
index 5fd3c35..c84654e 100644
--- a/How-I-Learned-to-Balance-Probability-Models%2C-ROI-Thinking%2C-and-the-Limits-of-Prediction.md
+++ b/How-I-Learned-to-Balance-Probability-Models%2C-ROI-Thinking%2C-and-the-Limits-of-Prediction.md
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-
 When I first began working with probability models, I thought I had found the answer. If I could assign numbers to outcomes, I could predict them. That was the assumption.
 It felt logical.
 I built simple frameworks, compared probabilities, and expected consistency. When outcomes didn’t match my expectations, I didn’t question the model—I questioned the result.
@@ -30,7 +29,7 @@ It took time to accept that short-term results could be misleading. I had to loo
 I kept reminding myself: one result doesn’t define the process.
 That mindset helped me stay consistent when outcomes felt unpredictable.
 ## I Compared My Thinking With Broader Discussions
-At one point, I started reading discussions on platforms like `https://www.goal.com/` where performance and expectations are often debated. I wasn’t looking for answers. I was looking for perspective.
+At one point, I started reading discussions on platforms like [goal](https://www.goal.com/)  where performance and expectations are often debated. I wasn’t looking for answers. I was looking for perspective.
 It helped.
 I noticed that even experienced analysts disagreed on interpretation. That reinforced an important idea—there isn’t a single correct model. There are multiple ways to approach uncertainty.
 That realization made me more flexible in my thinking.